Justice for the
Atrocities of the 1980s:
The Responsibility of
Politicians and Political Parties
By
Rakiya A. Omaar
Like so many other Somalis, my life in the
1980s was marked profoundly by the terrible human right situation under the
regime of Mohamed Siad Barre. I was one of the very lucky ones. I did not
live in Somalia at the time, and no-one in my family was killed or maimed
when the government unleashed a genocidal frenzy in Somaliland, then the
Northwest region of Somalia. Being lucky implied a responsibility: to let
the world know what was happening, so it could exert pressure to halt the
atrocities. Fortunately, I had just begun my career in human rights as
director of the US-based group, Africa Watch. This position gave me a
platform from which I could speak and make my contribution.
I am, in particular, proud of one book I
researched and wrote while at Africa Watch, A Government at War With Its Own
People: Testimonies About the Killings and the Conflict in the North,
published in New York in January 1990. Unfortunately, the Ethiopian
government of the time refused us permission to interview the refugees in
the Ethiopian camps. So the research took me to Djibouti and to various
cities in the UK which housed men, women and children who had fled Siad
Barre’s tactics of terror. I spent months listening to harrowing testimony
about a well-planned campaign to eliminate an entire people. It is not
possible to do justice to their stories in an article, but this is the
picture that emerged. I am writing about this book now, 12 years later,
because it has, once again, entered the political arena.
Arguing that all Isaaqs were supporters of
the Somali National Movement (SNM), the guerrilla movement that sought to
drive the government out of the Northwest, life, as we know it, was denied
to them in their own homeland from 1981 to May 1988, It became, instead, a
succession of human rights abuses. Murder; detentions; torture; unfair
trials; confiscation of land and other property; constraints on freedom of
movement and of expression; a strategy of humiliation directed at family
life, at women and elders; the denial of equal opportunities; discriminatory
business practices and curfews and checkpoints became a daily affair. Both
urban centres and rural communities were targeted, but it was the nomadic
population, regarded as the backbone of the SNM economically and in terms of
human resources, which suffered the most. Their men and boys were gunned
down, their women raped, their water reservoirs destroyed and people, as
well as livestock, were blown up by landmines.
In late May 1988, the SNM attacked the
towns of Hargeisa and Burao. It was the start of a savage war against Isaaq
civilians which drove most of them into exile in the inhospitable desert of
Ethiopia. Instead of engaging the SNM militarily, the government used the
full range of its military hardware against unarmed and defenceless
civilians, thinking perhaps that the SNM would be too preoccupied with the
chaos of mass civilian casualties to fight back effectively. The assault
knew no bounds: residential homes were bombed, fleeing refugees were strafed
by planes and men, women and children perished by the thousands.
Riyaale
was head of the feared and powerful secret service, the National
Security Service (NSS) and now he is the President of Somaliland |
Mohamed Said Barre is not alone in his
guilt for these crimes against humanity, for which no-one has yet been
prosecuted. Some of the other key architects of this policy of annihilation,
men like Mohamed Saeed Morgan, Mohamed Hashi Gaani and countless other
collaborators, continue to wreak havoc in Somalia. Others, including Mohamed
Ali Samater, live in comfortable exile in the United States and elsewhere in
the world. And then others are right here in Somaliland. And they include
President Dahir Rayaale, who was head of the feared and powerful secret
service, the National Security Service (NSS) in Berbera. President Rayaale
is named in A Government at War With Its Own People.
The town of Berbera saw some of the worst
atrocities of the war, even though the SNM never entered Berbera in 1988.
Elders and businessmen were immediately arrested en masse after the SNM
attack on Hargeisa and Burao; between 27 May and 1 June, they were
transferred to Mogadishu. The killings, which were exceptionally brutal in
Berbera, began shortly afterwards. Many of the victims had their throats
slit and were then shot. A series of massacres which have been mentioned
again and again took place, mainly in June, in Buraosheikh, close to Berbera,
when about 500 men were killed in groups of between 30-40. Some of the
victims were from Burao, Hargeisa and surrounding villages who had come as
temporary labourers to the port of Berbera. Others were asylum seekers who
had been returned from Saudia Arabia. The names of some of these men are
listed in the book. As head of the NSS in Berbera, Dahir Rayaale bears a
heavy and direct responsibility for their fate.
Witnesses who are alive also recall
Rayaale’s contribution to the war against civilians. One of the people I
interviewed in Djibouti in August 1989 and who is cited in the book is
Abdifatah Abdillahi Jirreh. He was only 14 at the time, but he remembered
Dahir Rayaale.
One day in mid-August [1988], Dahir Rayaale,
head of the NSS, came to our ice plant and took my father away. They also
arrested one of the watchmen, an old man, Farah Badeh Gheedi. They were
detained in the police station, accused of talking about the prospects of
the SNM coming to Berbera.
Rayaale is not the only man who has held a
senior political position in Somaliland whose conduct of human rights has
been questioned. Many former Isaaq members of the NSS and the HANGASH, the
military police that came to exert formidable power over civilians, today
occupy key positions in Somaliland in the NSS, re-established in 1995, and
the Criminal Investigations Department (CID). The people they tortured,
interrogated and spied on, and the people whose loved ones they killed,
will, one day, no doubt give their own account.
So the issue is not one of clan and
community identity, but of individual responsibility for grave injustices.
These men, whether they are Isaaqs or non-Isaaqs, must answer for what they
did in their political and professional capacity. And the political parties
to which they belong must investigate these accusations thoroughly and
objectively and respond accordingly. The three political parties who will
contest the forthcoming presidential elections—UDUB, Kulmiye and UCID—must
ensure that they do not recruit, let alone put forward as candidates, human
rights offenders. Since the accusations in the book became a matter of
public debate, “witnesses” have gone on television to say that Rayaale
actually saved lives. That is not the point; he may well have saved some
people, but that does not prove that he did not commit the acts of which he
is accused.
The case about President Rayaale is
especially serious because he is a candidate in the first free presidential
elections that the country has known in more than 30 years. He became
president, not through the will of the people, but appointed by the House of
Elders on the death of the late President Mohamed Ibrahim Egal. But now it
is a matter of choice. If he wins, he will remain in power for five years.
Justice for the victims is at stake. But so is the future of Somaliland. The
crimes of the 1980s is the very reason why Somaliland decided to secede from
Somalia in May 1991. The fact that men like Morgan and Gaani retain
considerable power in Somalia is a major issue for people in Somaliland.
Only a leader whose own hands are clean has the legitimacy to speak for
Somaliland on such major questions as the prosecution of war criminals and
to represent his people effectively regionally and internationally.
The question will be asked: why has it
taken so long for this information to be widely disseminated and known,
despite the fact that it was documented as early as 1990? There are many
factors, the most important of which was the decision taken in May 1991 to
pursue a policy of reconciliation in Somaliland. But even then, the leading
perpetrators of war crimes were excluded and a committee named to pursue
their case. But settling the internal conflicts of the 1990s drained energy
that might have been devoted to that task. So justice took a back seat. But
with the prospect of electing a president who faces such serious
accusations, Somaliland cannot afford to remain silent. Keeping quiet means
that tens of thousands of people died for nothing. It means that an entire
people became impoverished and stateless refugees for nothing. It means that
Hargeisa, Burao, Berbera and other towns became roofless ghost towns for
nothing. And it means that any attempt to pursue the likes of Morgan and
Gaani will be laughed out of court. It is time to speak out and set the
record straight.
*Rakiya A. Omaar is the director of the
international human rights organisation, African Rights.
Source:
hadhwanaag | Wed, 22 Jan 2003
Kulaabo bogga www.SomaliTalk.com
|